That’s barely 80 losses a year!

The Official Site of The Philadelphia Phillies: News: For Phillies, 125 years of baseball

One hundred and twenty-five years ago, there was Phillies baseball, but no television, automobiles, airplanes, radio, NFL, NBA or NHL. Heck, when the Phillies celebrated their 100th anniversary in 1983, there was no Internet, no iPods, no text messaging.

Through last night (Wednesday, April 30th), the Phillies had an all-time record of 8868-10041. As noted, that’s over 80 losses a year for 125 years. But wait!

Looking at their all-time season by season record, we see that many of those season featured many fewer games than are no played. For example, in their very first season, the Phillies lost 81 games, just over the historical average. Unfortunately, the only played 98 games for a “disappointing” 17-81 record. The next year, they more than doubled their winning percentage to .348, barely above one win for every two losses. The rest of the 19th Century, though, they were pretty good, to be honest. Then came the Dark Ages.

Between 1918 and 1948, the Phillies had precisely ONE winning season. That was 1932 when the Phightin’ Phils went 78-76. Five of those seasons featured sub-.300 winning percentages, with another right at .300. In other words, their winning percentages in those years weren’t even good batting averages.

They’ve won ONE World Series in 125 years; the Florida Marlins have won two in 15. They’ve made the World Series 5 times in that span.

In order to reach a .500 record for their existence, the Phillies would have to win every game they played for the next 7.24 162-game seasons. If they simply go 91-71, a .561 percentage that will put them in competition almost every year, they will have to repeat that record for the next 57 years to reach .500. If they went 101-61 which would put them in the playoffs almost every season, it would take them 30 seasons to reach .500 for their existence.

For comparison’s sake, in their existence, the Cubs have have won over 10,000 games (10,002 to be exact, as compared to 9,469 losses), won the pennant 16 times and won two World Series.

So Cubs fans who whine about how hard it is rooting for a team with a history of losing can shut the hell up. There is no current team with a history of futility like the Phillies. Everyone else whining about how hard it is rooting for their team is a bunch of poser wannabes. Only Philadelphia truly knows the pain of rooting for a losing team.

My Two Cents

Greetings from

You saved $0.02 with’s Pre-order Price Guarantee!

The price of the item(s) decreased after you ordered them, and we gave you the lowest price.

The following title(s) decreased in price:

The Complete Peanuts 1967-1968 (Complete Peanuts)
Price on order date: $19.13
Price charged at shipping: $19.11
Lowest price before release date: $19.11
Quantity: 1
Total Savings: $0.02

$0.02 is your total savings under our Pre-order Price Guarantee.


Thanks for shopping at, and we hope to see you again soon.

You can track the status of this order, and all your orders, online by visiting Your Account at

This just amused me.

“I didn’t abandon the Republican party. They abandoned me.”

Yes Tim Morgan, we have abandoned the feckless squishes for a "direct to real conservative candidates" approach. | Redstate

I long ago stopped giving money to political parties and committees. Why should I give money to the Republican State Committee of Delaware when some of that money could help support Liane Sorenson or Steve Amick (in the past) who I would never support and shouldn’t even be a Republican? I give directly to candidates or to single-issue political action committees only. I don’t want to indirectly support someone whose views oppose mine, so why on earth would I give money to a committee that might do just that?

The quote in the title came from the first comment. I have met the author of that comment, and she’s very conservative. (And her nickname that’s never used to her face is exactly what you’d expect it to be.)